My discussion with Sargon of Akkad (aka Carl Benjamin) on these topics:
What inspired you to write a book explaining postmodernism?
Military history suggests that pomo is an attack strategy–is it?
Pomo is brilliant but diabolical, but why is it the far Left that’s using it most?
But pomo is not really communist, is it?
The manifest failures of socialism and the accomplishments of liberal capitalism–how did intelligent socialists respond?
Rhetorical strategies when truth and justice don’t matter?
Language is the prison of thought–is that key to postmodernism?
If everything is deconstructed, why does anything matter, including the evils of racism and sexism?
If values are subjective, why criticize others’ values?
Western culture’s points of sensitivity–freedom, dignity, equality–attack precisely those?
“Machiavelli”?
Sheth’s Towards a Political Philosophy of Race and Islamic theocracy: relativism and asymmetrical attacks on liberalism?
Is it illiberal to impose liberal values?
Why do some Western hyphenated-feminists ignore oppression of women in other parts of the world?
The unholy alliance of some western feminists and theocratic mullahs–common victim status?
Why do we see postmodernism manifested in so many fields–art, music, architecture, and so on?
Art and postmodernism and our different reactions?
Values, narratives, and metanarratives–attacking values?
The example of Muhammad and his child-bride?
“Civilization” versus “culture.”
Personal self-worth and identity–destabilizing psychological attacks on them.
How do we do best to fight back against postmodernism?