Conservatives: Get Over the Dark Ages [Open College series]

Audio links:

Topics: The “Dark” Ages or The “Brilliant” Ages? // Chronology // Was there a Dark Age? // Why did the activity pick up after the year 1000? // Roger Bacon and Thomas Aquinas // Why is the debate significant today? // The verdict on Christianity // The verdict on modernity and the Enlightenment //  Why the Dark Ages matter to Christians and conservatives // The third form of conservatism, and my argument against it.

Transcription: Forthcoming

Sources:

  • Anthony Esolen, Were the Middle Ages Dark? Professor at Thomas More College, Providence.
  • Irving Kristol. Quoted in Rusher, 1995.
  • Steven J. Lenzer, “Two Cheers for Postmodernism,” The Weekly Standard, October 25, 1999, p. 38.
  • William Manchester, A World Lit Only By Fire, p. 5.
  • William A. Rusher. The Ambiguous Legacy of the Enlightenment, University Press of America, 1995.
  • Ernest van den Haag, in Rusher, ed. Ambiguous Legacy of the Enlightenment, p. 82. Professor at Fordham University.
  • Bryan Ward-Perkins, The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization.
  • Medieval Timeline graphic.

Related:

The complete series of Open College with Stephen Hicks podcasts.

 

1 thought on “Conservatives: Get Over the Dark Ages [Open College series]”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *