Two intelligent, non-professional responses to my book Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. A study in contrast — content, method, and civility.
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/
https://www.stitcher.com/
https://open.spotify.com/
The mentioned Cato Unbound articles on Kant and Classical Liberalism: https://www.stephenhicks.org/2017/09/20/immanual-kant-versus-liberalism-my-three-posts-collected/
Contact Dr. Hicks on twitter @SRChicks or visit http://
Parler: @OpenCollege. Minds: www.minds.com/opencollege. Facebook: www.facebook.com/
All audio versions of the podcast are available free at my website, YouTube, Bitchute, Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud. To cover additional production costs, the transcriptions are available only to my subscribers via my media page at thinkspot.
The next two in the Open College series — “Nietzsche’s Natural Slaves and Masters” — “Ayn Rand’s Critique of Nietzsche’s Ethics” — are recorded and into production.
We’re also now posting serially at thinkspot the transcripts of my Open College podcasts.
Thanks for doing the response video.
I’ll need to check out Multiversity. As a tangent to the success or failure of enlightenment philosophy, what do you think are the major weaknesses of the enlightenment? I’m just a layman, so my own understanding of the shortfalls of modernism consist primarily of finding the grains of truth buried in the pomo critiques. For instance, I think Kant’s epistemology is a result of modernism’s failure to deal with error. Subjective experience of the objective world is going to result in errors, but that doesn’t mean we’re completely cut off from the objective world. I can understand Kant’s critique, and I think it’s a response to a gap in enlightenment thinking. So what do you see as the the biggest weakness of modernism, or which of the pomo critiques do you think is strongest?
So many of his audience will just laugh along with Cuck, and then never look into your work. Multiversity and this are good, even though they’ll probably reach only part of Cuck’s audience.
Would you be able, and willing, to provide the two articles by Foucault on your site? “The Subject and Power” and “For an Ethic of Discomfort” from “Power (Essential Works; Vol 3)”.