[Humor alert: When I last taught Contemporary European Philosophy, I offered this alternative final exam.]
Contemptible European Philosophy
Dr. Shicks
Alternative (Reality) Exam
1. Identify the correct choice. Jean-Paul Sartre was a(n):
a) Existentialist.
b) Essentialist.
c) Excellent way to put yourself to sleep.
d) Guy who knew how to have his way with the ladies.
2. “Why does the universe exist?” is logically equivalent to:
a) “Why doesn’t the universe not exist?”
b) Itself.
c) Asking for a one-way ticket to the mental ward.
d) All of the above.
3. Michel Foucault wrote a book.
a) True.
b) False.
c) The statement must be deconstructed to reveal its hidden power agenda.
4. Suppose during the exam that you look deeply into the soul of the person next to you and find the meaning of life. This would be:
a) Proof that you have mastered the metaphysics portion of the course.
b) Cheating, and therefore a violation of the university’s Honor Code.
5. The number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin is:
a) Infinite, since angels are non-physical beings and therefore not bound by physical limitations.
b) Zero, since angels are non-physical and dancing is by definition a physical activity.
c) Zero, since dancing is a lewd activity that morally pure angels would never engage in.
d) A statement that is in principle unverifiable and therefore meaningless.
6. The greatest philosopher of the 20th century was:
a) That beret-wearing guy.
b) Scooby Doo.
c) Oprah Winfrey.
d) Greatness is over-rated.
Bonus Question
7. Show your work.
[Disclaimer for a litigious age: This is not the real exam. This is an exercise in humor. If necessary, please look up “humor” in the dictionary.]
Still mulling the questions but it strikes me that the following might be relevant – from the great philosophic journal ‘Reader’s Digest’:
“To be is to do.”
– Friedrich Nietzsche
“To do is to be.”
– Jean Paul Sartre
“Do-be-do-be-do.”
– Frank Sinatra
At long last, we see Ed’s philosophic fount!
Shhhh!!
I think the correct question to ask here is whose “correct” answers are we talking about, and who benefits from their perceived “correctness”?
Why is that the correct question, Arvid?
(Or are we supposed to apply your criterion and ask of your question who benefits from the “correct” answer to it? That way lies an infinite regress of cynicism.)