Stephen Hicks

How Smart and Well-Read was Adolf Hitler? [new The Good Life column]

The opening of my latest column at EveryJoe: “One century ago, Adolf Hitler was fighting in the Great War. He was a good soldier — he would be promoted to the rank of corporal, be wounded two times, and be awarded six medals. And with him during the war he had the writings of philosopher Arthur […]

How Smart and Well-Read was Adolf Hitler? [new The Good Life column] Read More »

Upcoming keynote speech (and one other) in Nanjing, China

I will be participating in the 2nd International Conference on CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Building New Bridges Between Business & Society, to be held in Nanjing, P.R., China, from July 29 to 31 and hosted by the Nanjing University of Finance and Economics. My contributions to the conference will be two talks. One will

Upcoming keynote speech (and one other) in Nanjing, China Read More »

Does the Meaning of Life Depend on There Being an Afterlife? [new Theist vs. Atheist series column]

The opening of John C. Wright’s latest column in the Theist vs. Atheist series debate at EveryJoe: “The question for this week is whether the meaning of life depends on there being an afterlife. “Like most questions raised when discussing the topic of supernaturalism versus naturalism, the question contains a hidden and deeper question which

Does the Meaning of Life Depend on There Being an Afterlife? [new Theist vs. Atheist series column] Read More »

Piotr Kostyło’s review of *Nietzsche and the Nazis*

Professor Piotr Kostyło of Casimir the Great University in Bydgoszcz, Poland, published a review of Nietzsche and the Nazis. The text of the review follows: Do We Know What We Advocate? Stephen Hicks’s Defence of Individualism The forty-five years of communism in Poland (1944-1989) were marked by the government reminding society of the atrocities committed during

Piotr Kostyło’s review of *Nietzsche and the Nazis* Read More »

On Natural Morality and Religious Amoralism [new Theist vs. Atheist series column]

The opening of my latest column in the Theist vs. Atheist series debate at EveryJoe: “In my judgment, issues of morality are the most difficult in philosophy. They are intellectually challenging, as everything about the human condition is relevant to them, and they are emotionally gripping, as our highest values are always at stake. “So

On Natural Morality and Religious Amoralism [new Theist vs. Atheist series column] Read More »