History of Philosophy

Philipse’s book on Heidegger — David Auerbach’s review

Leave a Comment / History of Philosophy /

Professor Kevin Hill drew my attention to Auerbach’s review of Herman Philipse’s Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being (Princeton, 1998) and this excerpt from Philipse in particular: Heidegger’s individualistic notion of authenticity, according to which Dasein has to liberate itself from common moral rules in order to choose one’s hero freely, tends to collapse into a collectivist […]

Philipse’s book on Heidegger — David Auerbach’s review Read More »

Long on Kant and liberal politics [Cato Unbound Series]

Leave a Comment / History of Philosophy /

Professor Roderick T. Long has published his essay, “Kant: Liberal, Illiberal, or Both?”, in the Cato Unbound discussion series. Here is the abstract of his essay: Roderick Long offers a complex view of Immanuel Kant, who emerges as more often liberal in principle than in practice. Kant approved of taxation, a welfare state, and even

Long on Kant and liberal politics [Cato Unbound Series] Read More »

Kant’s non-defense of classical liberalism — my article for Cato Unbound

Leave a Comment / History of Philosophy, Politics /

In the Cato Unbound series, my article “Does Kant Have a Place in Classical Liberalism?” is now up. Here, courtesy of editor Jason Kuznicki, is an abstract: Stephen R. C. Hicks argues that if our case for liberty comes from a mysterious other realm, then perhaps we have no case at all. He describes how

Kant’s non-defense of classical liberalism — my article for Cato Unbound Read More »

Updating the Philosophy’s Longest Sentences competition

2 Comments / History of Philosophy, Philosophy /

More on philosophers’ mind-numbingly long sentences. My initial post with my top candidates is here. Kazuma Kitamura sends in a new contender — a 175 word plea from Chapter One of John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women: “If the authority of men over women, when first established, had been the result of a conscientious

Updating the Philosophy’s Longest Sentences competition Read More »

The real father of modern philosophy — Bacon versus Descartes

4 Comments / History of Philosophy /

[At the beginning of the new academic year, a re-visiting of the beginnings of modern philosophy.] I vote for Francis Bacon. . . The standard answer gives the honor to René Descartes. Descartes’s claim to the title is based primarily on his epistemology — specifically his method of doubt. The method of doubt is both

The real father of modern philosophy — Bacon versus Descartes Read More »