Philosophy

ABSOLUTE DUTY: KANT. Lecture 2 of Philosophy of Ethics course [Peterson Academy]

“Duty is the necessity to act out of reverence for the law.” Lecture Two: Absolute Duty Themes: Purifying Ethics. Divine Command Theory. Moses. Uzzah. Whose interests: Egoist, Predatory, Altruist? None: Deontology. Texts: Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and Critique of Practical Reason About the Instructor Stephen R. C. Hicks, Ph.D. is Professor of […]

ABSOLUTE DUTY: KANT. Lecture 2 of Philosophy of Ethics course [Peterson Academy] Read More »

Marxists and Violence — quotations, podcast, and video

Following up on posts on Marxism and its fellow travelers (Engels, Mao, Guzmán, Hobsbawm), a question about whether Marxism’s brutal history is a built-in consequence of its principles or an accidental by-product of well-intentioned theory. So a series of quotations (with sources) from some principal figures: Marx in 1848: “there is only one way in

Marxists and Violence — quotations, podcast, and video Read More »

Derrida: Deconstruction is “within the tradition of a certain Marxism.”

“Deconstruction never had meaning or interest, at least in my eyes, than as a radicalization, that is to say, also within the tradition of a certain Marxism in a certain spirit of Marxism.” Source: Jacques Derrida, Specters of Marx. Routledge, 1994. Related: On the fuller context of Derrida’s provocative claim: Related: On Derrida’s place in

Derrida: Deconstruction is “within the tradition of a certain Marxism.” Read More »

The 3 Marxisms — as ‘scientific’, ‘religious’, ‘psychology’

Will the real Communists please identify yourselves? One reads of … * Communism as atheist scientific materialism. “The iron laws of historical development.” * Communism as fanatical religion: “The exploited shall inherit the Earth!” * Communism as angry envy-psychology: “Kill the rich!” My podcast at Open College: Related: “The Crisis of Socialism,” Chapter 5 of

The 3 Marxisms — as ‘scientific’, ‘religious’, ‘psychology’ Read More »

Idealism and Education: Plato and Kant [Lecture 7 of Philosophy of Education course]

By Professor Stephen R.C. Hicks, Rockford University, USA. Lecture 7: What did the great Idealist philosophers believe and how did they apply it to education? The associated reading excerpts are here: Plato (https://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/plato_republic-poe.pdf) and Kant (https://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/kant_immanuel-poe.pdf). Previous lectures in the series: Part One: Introduction: What is the purpose of education, and what is philosophy’s relevance?

Idealism and Education: Plato and Kant [Lecture 7 of Philosophy of Education course] Read More »

WHAT IS the MEANING OF LIFE? LOCKE v. ROUSSEAU. Lecture 1 of Philosophy of Ethics course [Peterson Academy]

“We naturally, even from our cradles, love liberty.” Lecture One: What Is the Meaning of Life? Themes: Traditional Hierarchy? Liberty and/or Equality. Six Deep Questions about Ethics. What is ‘Modern’? Texts: Locke, Essay concerning Human Understanding. Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality About the Instructor Stephen R. C. Hicks, Ph.D., is Professor of Philosophy

WHAT IS the MEANING OF LIFE? LOCKE v. ROUSSEAU. Lecture 1 of Philosophy of Ethics course [Peterson Academy] Read More »

“There are two kinds of people. Avoid both.” Schopenhauer did not say this (but I kinda wish he had)

He did say: “The majority of men … are not capable of thinking, but only of believing, and … are not accessible to reason, but only to authority” (Parerga and Paralipomena, 1851) [Alternative translation here: “For the average man has no critical power of his own, and is absolutely incapable of appreciating the difficulty of

“There are two kinds of people. Avoid both.” Schopenhauer did not say this (but I kinda wish he had) Read More »