Philosophy

Imperialism and Capitalism

Capitalism: All humans have the rights to life, liberty, and property. Imperialism: We have the right to control you, take your stuff, and kill you if you resist.  Imperialism existed for millennia before the revolutionary modern world of the last few centuries. During the modern era, both capitalism’s liberalism and imperialism’s authoritarianism existed within modernizing […]

Imperialism and Capitalism Read More »

La igualdad está amenazada por la libertad. [Liberalism: Pro & Con en Español]

Quince argumentos para el Capitalismo Liberal: Este post va a formar parte de una serie de argumentos del libro “Liberalism: Pro & Con” de Stephen Hicks en español. Pueden encontrar todos los argumentos que serán publicados en orden en el siguiente link: Liberalism: Pro & Con en español. EN CONTRA Argumento 10: La igualdad está

La igualdad está amenazada por la libertad. [Liberalism: Pro & Con en Español] Read More »

Sartre on dealing with bad faith “anti-racists”

What Jean-Paul Sartre said about the anti-Semites of his day applies perfectly to the language-and-emotion manipulating so-called “anti-racists” of our day: “Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who

Sartre on dealing with bad faith “anti-racists” Read More »

Paperback edition of Explaining Postmodernism new for 2023

I’m pleased that the book is still in print after so many years, and especially pleased with this new paperback printing. Explaining Postmodernism is a philosophical intellectual history of the roots of postmodernism. Its one-sentence thesis is: The failure of epistemology made postmodernism possible; the failure of socialism made postmodernism necessary. Here are links to

Paperback edition of Explaining Postmodernism new for 2023 Read More »

Pol Pot’s Cambodia and Pinochet’s Chile: (Im)Morally Equivalent?

1. A short follow-up on moral equivalencing. Yesterday I posted this about the killing fields in Cambodia under Marxist communism. Immediately I got huffy responses like “But what about Pinochet in Chile?!” And “Don’t forget the US also supported right-wing dictator Pinochet.” 2. Pinochet was a bad guy. No question. Yet numbers and context matter.

Pol Pot’s Cambodia and Pinochet’s Chile: (Im)Morally Equivalent? Read More »