Politics

Religion and the Verdict of History [Theist vs. Atheist series]

[This column is a part of the Theist vs. Atheist series debate between Stephen Hicks and John C. Wright. This is Hicks’s response to Wright’s column. Here are the links to other columns in the series.] To evaluate religion’s track record we need to specify our evaluative benchmarks and identify whether we are evaluating religion generically

Religion and the Verdict of History [Theist vs. Atheist series] Read More »

Kant’s non-defense of classical liberalism — my article for Cato Unbound

In the Cato Unbound series, my article “Does Kant Have a Place in Classical Liberalism?” is now up. Here, courtesy of editor Jason Kuznicki, is an abstract: Stephen R. C. Hicks argues that if our case for liberty comes from a mysterious other realm, then perhaps we have no case at all. He describes how

Kant’s non-defense of classical liberalism — my article for Cato Unbound Read More »

Is Political Evil Built into Religion? [Theist vs. Atheist series]

[This essay is a part of the Theist vs. Atheist debate series between Stephen Hicks and John C. Wright. Here Hicks responds to Wright’s previous column. Here are the links to other essays in the series.] We live in good times for religion and politics. The great majority of us are free to practice or not

Is Political Evil Built into Religion? [Theist vs. Atheist series] Read More »

The Three Stages of Far-Left Advocacy (sarcastic version)

Now that we are solidly into Stage 3 … Stage 1 (early 20th century): Socialism is really true and moral and liberal capitalism is evil. [The evidence comes in. Shit.] Stage 2 (late 20th century): Evidence and logic are subjective constructs and all alternative constructs are equal. [Liberal-capitalist constructs continue to appeal to many people.

The Three Stages of Far-Left Advocacy (sarcastic version) Read More »