Search Results for: Art

Keynes: bad economics and bad politics

David Weinberger beats up on Keynes’s economics here: “despite numerous experiments since the 1930s, never has Keynesian policy precipitated a peacetime economic recovery.” And I beat up on Keynes’s politics here: “Keynes was not merely recommending a few surgical interventions to smooth out cycles or to jump-start moribund economies. Keynes’s economics are part of a

Keynes: bad economics and bad politics Read More »

Tyler Ashby discussion: Pomo, Perception, and Reason

Our discussion is embedded below or at YouTube. Topics discussed: 1:00: The various uses of “postmodern” 3:30: The epistemology of reason in early modern philosophy 4:30: Pomo as a skepticism about reason by mid-1900s 5:00: Individualism in early modern philosophy 7:00: Pomo as a reaction to individualism 7:30: Social-psychological-linguistic determinisms of mid-1900s 10:10: Perception and

Tyler Ashby discussion: Pomo, Perception, and Reason Read More »

Was Ayn Rand an intellectual Stalin?

Grégoire Canlorbe is a French intellectual entrepreneur. He currently resides in Paris. He interviewed me for The Foundation for Economic Education. Excerpt below: Grégoire Canlorbe: According to me, the underlying force that makes Ayn Rand’s heroes so addictive is power. They are in the railroad industry, a 130-year-old business built by the ingenuity and hard work

Was Ayn Rand an intellectual Stalin? Read More »

Jordan Peterson discussion now with subtitles

Our 90-minute conversation about the philosophy, psychology, and politics of postmodernism is below or at at YouTube. For subtitles in English, click the cc button in the lower right-center part of the frame. Dr. Peterson’s introduction: “On August 17, I spoke with Dr. Stephen Hicks, professor in the philosophy department at Rockford University. Dr. Hicks

Jordan Peterson discussion now with subtitles Read More »

Nancy MacLean’s attack — lazy jury fallacy or pomo strategy?

Jonathan Adler’s lengthy list of problems in Nancy MacLean’s book, which seems to be about a social construct labelled “James Buchanan.” What explains how such a book could be written by a professor and published by an academic press? (1) Trevor Burrus suggests that it could be the Lazy Jury Fallacy at work. (2) I

Nancy MacLean’s attack — lazy jury fallacy or pomo strategy? Read More »